Pupil premium strategy statement
This statement details our school’s use of pupil premium (and recovery premium for the 2021 to 2024 academic year) funding to help improve the attainment of our disadvantaged pupils.
It outlines our pupil premium strategy, how we intend to spend the funding over the period of the plan and the effect that last year’s spending of pupil premium had within our school.
School overview
Detail | Data |
School name | Cherry Burton CE Primary School |
Number of pupils in school | 163 |
Proportion (%) of pupil premium eligible pupils | 7 |
Academic year/years that our current pupil premium strategy plan covers (3 year plans are recommended) | 2021 - 2024 |
Date this statement was published | 13/12/21 |
Date on which it will be reviewed | 30/11/23 |
Statement authorised by | Dawn Joy |
Pupil premium lead | Sarah Shepherdson |
Governor / Trustee lead | Ryan Daniel |
Funding overview
Detail | Amount |
Pupil premium funding allocation this academic year | £12150 |
Recovery premium funding allocation this academic year |
|
Pupil premium funding carried forward from previous years (enter £0 if not applicable) | £0 |
Total budget for this academic year If your school is an academy in a trust that pools this funding, state the amount available to your school this academic year | £12150 |
Part A: Pupil premium strategy plan
Statement of intent
To ensure disadvantaged pupils make progress and attain at levels at least in line with their peers To ensure disadvantaged pupils are supported with SEMH needs to remove any barriers to learning and social and academic success To provide enrichment opportunities beyond their socio economic demographic To support parents and carers in order to equip them with anything necessary to ensure they are able to effectively support pupils beyond the school setting
A holistic strategy enables the school to regular assess all areas of need and provide early and appropriate intervention to both social and academic needs. |
Challenges
This details the key challenges to achievement that we have identified among our disadvantaged pupils.
Challenge number | Detail of challenge |
1 | Pupils not school ready upon entry
|
2 | Low self-esteem impacts upon ability & ambition
|
3 | Confidence issues prevent independence in learning
|
4 | Lack of cultural capital affects curriculum access
|
Intended outcomes
This explains the outcomes we are aiming for by the end of our current strategy plan, and how we will measure whether they have been achieved.
Intended outcome | Success criteria |
Pupils to achieve GLD by the end of the Reception year Pupils language development in line with peers Pupils are ready for learning as they enter Year 1 Early identification of need has facilitated the correct internal and external intervention Referrals to outside agencies have been undertaken in a timely manner EHA undertaken when needed Smooth transition procedure in place so the school have accurate plans in place | GLD in line with peers and at least in line with National Accelerated progress with support from early identification and intervention Support plans in place where necessary to ensure further progress in Key Stage 1 |
BOXALL data demonstrates an increase in both confidence and resilience Behaviours for learning amongst disadvantaged pupils demonstrate engagement across all areas of the curriculum Academic progress and attainment for disadvantaged pupils is at least in line with their peers | BOXALL profiles will show improvements in all areas of SEMH need 100% of disadvantaged pupils will maintain, or where needed, improve their trajectory of academic progress in all areas of the curriculum |
BOXALL profile shows pupils are resilient and able to access the curriculum with increasing independence Academic progress and attainment for disadvantaged pupils is at least in line with their peers Disadvantaged pupils have the confidence to engage in wider aspects of school life
| BOXALL profiles will show improvements in all areas of SEMH need 100% of disadvantaged pupils will maintain, or where needed, improve their trajectory of academic progress in all areas of the curriculum |
For all disadvantaged pupils to have experience and understanding of the world both within and outside the area that they live For disadvantaged pupils to become courageous advocates for positive change for themselves and their peers locally, nationally and globally For disadvantaged pupils to have high aspirations and an understanding of what is available to them in the wider world | Wider exposure provided through high quality text across all areas of the curriculum Enrichment opportunities provide a deeper understanding of life in modern day Britain |
Activity in this academic year
This details how we intend to spend our pupil premium (and recovery premium funding) this academic year to address the challenges listed above.
Teaching (for example, CPD, recruitment and retention)
Budgeted cost: £4000
Activity | Evidence that supports this approach | Challenge number(s) addressed |
Transtion conversations and planning with feeder settings | It is not possible to raise attainment and progress for pupils who have barriers to their learning. Removing these barriers ensure children are ready and able to learn. Sutton Trust data: Social/emotional aspects of learning = average impact +4 mths Moderate impact for low cost | 1 |
Appropriate CPD sourced. Intervention facilitated to accelerate progress (NELI, CHATTA, Ginger Bear, ELSA) | In order to access the curriculum, pupils need good basic skills and a firm foundation on which to build. Sutton Trust data: Small group tuition = average impact +4 mths Moderate impact for moderate cost Collaborative learning (with peers) = moderate impact for low costs +5mths | |
BOXALL profiling of all pupils to identify SEMH needs | It is not possible to raise attainment and progress for pupils who have barriers to their learning. Removing these barriers ensure children are ready and able to learn. Sutton Trust data: Social/emotional aspects of learning = average impact +4 mths Moderate impact for low cost |
|
Targeted academic support (for example, tutoring, one-to-one support structured interventions)
Budgeted cost: £5500
Activity | Evidence that supports this approach | Challenge number(s) addressed |
ELSA delivery for targeted pupils | In order to access the curriculum, pupils need good basic skills and a firm foundation on which to build. Sutton Trust data: Small group tuition = average impact +4 mths Moderate impact for moderate cost Collaborative learning (with peers) = moderate impact for low costs +5mths | 2 |
Small group intervention (Key Stage 2) | In order to access the curriculum, pupils need good basic skills and a firm foundation on which to build. Sutton Trust data: Small group tuition = average impact +4 mths Moderate impact for moderate cost Collaborative learning (with peers) = moderate impact for low costs +5mths | |
Phonics and early reading intervention | In order to access the curriculum, pupils need good basic skills and a firm foundation on which to build. Sutton Trust data: Small group tuition = average impact +4 mths Moderate impact for moderate cost Collaborative learning (with peers) = moderate impact for low costs +5mths |
|
Budgeted cost: £5500
Activity | Evidence that supports this approach | Challenge number(s) addressed |
ELSA sessions for targeted pupils | It is not possible to raise attainment and progress for pupils who have barriers to their learning. Removing these barriers ensure children are ready and able to learn. Sutton Trust data: Social/emotional aspects of learning = average impact +4 mths Moderate impact for low cost | 3 |
Small group intervention (whole school) | In order to access the curriculum, pupils need good basic skills and a firm foundation on which to build. Sutton Trust data: Small group tuition = average impact +4 mths Moderate impact for moderate cost Collaborative learning (with peers) = moderate impact for low costs +5mths | |
Access to Forest School activities and outdoor learning approach across the curriculum | Alternative learning activities and environments and activities develop confidence within pupils which in turn is reflected in attitudes to learning Sutton Trust data: Sports participation = low impact for moderate costs +2mths Arts participation = low impact for low cost +2mths Outdoor learning = moderate impact for moderate costs +4mth |
|
Wider strategies (for example, related to attendance, behaviour, wellbeing)
Budgeted cost: £2500
Activity | Evidence that supports this approach | Challenge number(s) addressed |
Access to subsidised peripatetic music lessons | Alternative learning activities and environments and activities develop confidence within pupils which in turn is reflected in attitudes to learning Sutton Trust data: Sports participation = low impact for moderate costs +2mths Arts participation = low impact for low cost +2mths Outdoor learning = moderate impact for moderate costs +4mth | 4 |
Subsidised access to a range of extra curricular activities | Alternative learning activities and environments and activities develop confidence within pupils which in turn is reflected in attitudes to learning Sutton Trust data: Sports participation = low impact for moderate costs +2mths Arts participation = low impact for low cost +2mths Outdoor learning = moderate impact for moderate costs +4mth | |
Involvement in the school's work on direct links with Parliament | Alternative learning activities and environments and activities develop confidence within pupils which in turn is reflected in attitudes to learning Sutton Trust data: Sports participation = low impact for moderate costs +2mths Arts participation = low impact for low cost +2mths Outdoor learning = moderate impact for moderate costs +4mth |
Total budgeted cost: £17500
Part B: Review of outcomes in the previous academic year
Pupil premium strategy outcomes
This details the impact that our pupil premium activity had on pupils in the 2022 to 2023 academic year.1
1. Emotional BOXALL profile used for all pupils to track progress of SEMH needs Intervention facilitated when required Pupils were correctly identified for ELSA support. ELSA TA support both pupils and families. ELSA TA worked in partnership with The Children's Centre to facilitate Family Links - two families completed the ten week programme and fedback positive outcomes at home Close partnerships with outside agencies ensured the correct support was in place Partnership working with the Local authority Behaviour Support Team provided training and support for staff working with individual pupils to ensue they could successfully access the mainstream classroom alongside peers SENCO, ELSA TA, HT regular pastoral reviews ensured the progress of pupils SEMH needs were regularly addressed and disadvantaged pupils were closely tracked Ongoing Nurture UK training for all teachers on whole class strategies to support needs identified on the Boxall profile led to individualised action plans focusing on need 2. Practical 100% of disadvantaged pupils have participated outdoor learning / forest school activities 100% of disadvantaged pupils to be offered music lesson at a subsidised rate Support provided to ensure disadvantaged pupils have access to enrichment opportunities 38% accessed subsidised music tuition
100% of PP children participated in the Now-Press-Play activities (multi sensory approach to learning)
100% of disadvantaged pupils accessed outdoor learning 1. Achievement – Specific outcomes will not be published due to small numbers in the cohort potentially identifying individual children.
Flight paths demonstrated 100% of pupils had maintained academic progress in Reading and Maths. Key Stage 2 Writing progress data was not in line with others (based on two pupils) Attainment is mixed across disadvantaged pupils and where pupils are not in line with their peers, intervention has been facilitated and tracked at termly pupil progress reviews BOXALL used across the school to identify barriers to learning Gap analysis of White Rose Maths and PIRA assessment informs intervention
|
Externally provided programmes
Programme | Provider |
Lexia |
|
TTRS |
|
Clicker |
|
Service pupil premium funding (optional)
Measure | Details |
How did you spend your service pupil premium allocation last academic year? | Service premium allocation formed part of the wider strategy allowing us to ensure we had accurate baseline data both in terms of BOXALL profile and academic attainment. Intervention has been provided to overcome gaps due to mobility |
What was the impact of that spending on service pupil premium eligible pupils? | Positive progress both with SEMH needs and academic attainment. Any barriers to learning were identified and TSP facilitated for some pupils. |
Further information (optional)
Regular attendance review Work with EWO Family Links training and subsequent support from ELSA TA |